There’s not much to say about this one. I mentioned earlier about how Disney is remaking their old properties and Mary Poppins Returns is essentially a remake of the 1964 classic without actually remaking it. It essentially follows the same beats. You have the Mary Poppins (this time played by Emily Blunt who is actually fine in the role) who comes from the sky to help the Banks children, more specifically the children of Michael Banks (Ben Winshaw) and, yes, even Michael and his sister Jane (Emily Mortimer). Like the last film, a major conflict in the film centers on the bank (the one his father worked at in the previous film) but this time Michael must repay a loan he took out or he and his family will lose the home to the evil bank manager played by Colin Firth.
Apart from the bath time/ocean adventure with Mary and the kids, every other sequence in the film is remarkably similar to the first film. A whole animated sequence in a porcelain bowl as opposed to Burt’s picture in the original, a sequence with Mary’s Eastern European cousin (played by Meryl Streep because…of course she’s in this movie) whose house turns upside down every other Wednesday leading to wacky hijinks which harkens back to Uncle Albert floating in air due to uncontrollable laughter, there is a whole portion of the film that has the Banks children leaving the bank following an embarrassing incident which leads to them getting lost. This leads to a dance and song number with the lamplighters of London who help the kids and Mary get home…which is just like the part of the original film with the chimney sweeps. This is a Mary Poppins remake as far as I’m concerned.
The songs are forgettable and irritating and absolutely none of them stuck with me in a good way after the screening. The performances from the rest of the cast are fine (well I didn’t take to Lin Manuel Miranda’s British accent and wanted him to shut up the minute he opened his mouth…no he’s not British. Why do you ask?). You have the point brought up over and over with Jane being a labor activist (just as the mother in the first film was a suffragette) which doesn’t go anywhere, any experienced moviegoer can spot the plot MacGuffin (bank shares that can save the home) even when it isn’t in plain sight…
This was one of the most forgettable films I have even seen in theaters and among the most boring I’ve ever seen. It ends exactly how you think it would where they save the house and have a final bright, colorful and excessively cheerful musical number in the sky that would give me diabetes if I watched it again at any point ever again.
I won’t tell you how to spend your money as there are plenty of choices this Holiday season. But between the two, I would tell you to see Mortal Engines. That’s just me. If you see Mary Poppins Returns you would probably enjoy it, but you couldn’t pay me to see that one again. I doubt this will happen, but I hope that an extended cut of Mortal Engines comes out. Why not? I want more. We’ll never get a sequel after all.